Prajna

From Theosopedia
Revision as of 03:29, 29 March 2012 by Riza2 (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

A Sanskrit term suggesting a superior form of knowledge, usually translated “wisdom,” from the prefix pra- meaning “before,” “forward,” “forth,” or “toward” and the root jñ€, “knowledge.” Prajñ€ is thus transcendental wisdom or intuition as it goes beyond the reasoning process of vijñ€na. It is an essential element of satori or enlightenment. D. T. SUZUKI states that in prajñ€, there is no differentiation between the seer and the seen, and it sees the whole and integrates rather than analyzes — it “ever seeks unity on the grandest possible scale” (Studies in Zen, p. 85). The awakening of prajñ€ is a “direct holding of Reality” which “gives the solution to all the questions we are capable of asking about our spiritual life.” And as it is “the leaping over an intellectual impasse, it is an act of Will” (The Essentials of Zen Buddhism, p. 25).

In yoga, the light of prajñ€ emerges after one is able to attain saˆyama, or the combined states of concentration, meditation and sam€dhi (Yoga S™tras, III:5).

In theosophical mysticism, prajñ€ is considered such a significant stage to reach that Helena P. Blavatsky calls it “the key to which makes of a man a god, creating him a Bodhisattva, son of the Dhy€nis” (Voice of the Silence).

In MAHšYšNA BUDDHISM it is the sixth stage in the perfection of wisdom (PRAJÑš-PšRAMITš); its contrast is VIJÑšNA, sometimes translated “conditioned consciousness.” In The Secret Doctrine, it is stated that prajñ€ “exists in seven different aspects corresponding to the seven conditions of matter” (SD I:139; cf. II:29 fn, 597 fn, 636, and 641). The term seems to be used there merely in the sense of consciousness in general. In an article entitled “Personal and Impersonal God” published in an early issue of The Theosophist and anthologized in Five Years of Theosophy (ed. G. R. S. Mead, 1894; reprint by Arno Press, 1976, p. 128), T. Subba Row concurs with HPB’s use of the term, defining prajñ€ as “the capacity of perception [which] exists in seven different aspects corresponding to the seven conditions of matter,” although adding that “there are really but six states of matter, the so-called seventh state being the aspect of cosmic matter in its original undifferentiated condition.” And, “Similarly there are six states of differentiated Prajñ€, the seventh state being a condition of perfect unconsciousness.” He then continues, “By differentiated Prajñ€, I mean the condition in which Prajñ€ is split up into various states of consciousness,” objective or subjective depending upon whether one can function on any particular plane of matter in a way that differentiates between a subject and an object. For most of us, the physical plane is the only one in which consciousness functions objectively, the higher planes being purely subjective for us at our present stage of evolution.

R.W.B./V.H.C.

© Copyright by the Theosophical Publishing House, Manila

Personal tools